Skip to content

Door-to-door fatigue planning checklist

This page provides an original checklist for considering door-to-door time and travel-related fatigue in site-based, mobile, and field operations. It prompts consideration of the full journey — not only scheduled duty hours.

Important: This checklist is not legal advice. It does not state that door-to-door time is always paid working time, does not set universal hour limits, and does not guarantee compliance. Adapt it to your organisation and review findings with competent persons. Sector-specific requirements vary.

  1. Define legs consistently — agree what counts as outward travel, duty, and return travel in your policy. See duty, travel, and commute.
  2. Apply to a specific assignment — a shift, possession, site visit, or multi-day job.
  3. Estimate typical and worst-case door-to-door duration for each leg.
  4. Record assumptions — origin (home, hotel, depot), mode of travel, and whether the worker is driving.
  5. Escalate for competent review where exposure appears elevated.
  6. Reassess when actual journeys differ from plan — see planned vs actual fatigue.

For the underlying concept, see door-to-door time. For wider field operations context, see infrastructure and field operations fatigue.

Check whether:

  • Journey from origin to work location is estimated (typical and worst case)
  • Early starts plus long outward travel compress sleep before duty — see early starts and fatigue
  • The worker is driving, a passenger, or using public transport
  • Delays and diversions are plausible in this operation
  • Outward travel is included in fatigue planning even if not paid working time

Check whether:

  • Planned duty start and finish times are recorded
  • Night work or long duties increase post-travel fatigue risk
  • Breaks and welfare on site are realistic — not assumed best case
  • Task demand during duty matches what planners assumed

Check whether:

  • Return journey duration and timing are estimated
  • Return travel occurs when alertness may be low (after night work or long day)
  • The worker may be driving after duty — ORR guidance notes that driving provides no opportunity for sleep, and travel does not rest in the same way as time at home
  • Alternatives (passenger travel, rest before driving, accommodation) have been considered where reasonably practicable
  • Multi-day assignments: is return travel on this day, or does the worker remain in accommodation?

Check whether:

  • Total elapsed time from leaving origin to returning is estimated
  • Early departure for outward travel adds to wakefulness before duty
  • Late finish plus long return extends the working day beyond duty hours
  • The combined pattern has been reviewed across consecutive days

Check whether:

  • Night duties are identified in the assignment
  • Return travel after a night shift occurs during circadian low — see night shift fatigue
  • Sleep opportunity before the next duty is realistic
  • Night work plus travel has been included in wider fatigue assessment

Check whether:

  • Driving — higher vigilance demand; no sleep opportunity; post-duty driving risk considered
  • Passenger / public transport — may reduce road risk to others but still limits restorative sleep compared with being at home
  • Shared travel — waiting, pickup points, and indirect routes add elapsed time
  • This checklist does not cover driver-hours, tachograph, or fleet compliance rules

Check whether:

  • Workers stay away from home during the assignment
  • Which day counts as the return leg when using site accommodation
  • Accommodation allows adequate sleep (noise, sharing, early departures)
  • Policy is clear on origin for each day’s door-to-door calculation

Check whether:

  • Sites are hard to reach with long or unpredictable journeys
  • Welfare facilities (rest areas, food, shelter) are available
  • Call-outs or extended duties could lengthen the day unexpectedly
  • Remote patterns are reviewed as a sequence, not isolated days

Check whether:

  • Rest is possible during travel (generally limited compared with being off duty at home)
  • On-site rest between tasks is realistic
  • Workers can raise welfare concerns without penalty — see worker fatigue reporting

Check whether:

  • Actual journey times are monitored when operations are disrupted
  • Overtime or overruns extend duty within the door-to-door period
  • Reassessment is triggered when actual exposure exceeds what was planned

Check whether:

  • Door-to-door assumptions are documented for the assignment
  • Who reviewed travel-related fatigue risk is recorded
  • Mitigations are noted if work proceeds with elevated exposure
  • Records support audit and learning — see fatigue records and audit

Consider escalation to a competent person when:

  • Door-to-door duration is materially longer than typical for the role
  • Post-duty driving follows night work or a long shift
  • Quick returns or consecutive long-travel days appear in the schedule
  • Workers report travel-related fatigue concerns
  • Model or assessment assumptions do not match operational reality

See management accountability for fatigue.

Field Entry
Assignment / role
Date(s)
Origin (home / hotel / depot)
Outward travel (est. typical / worst)
Duty period
Return travel (est. typical / worst)
Driving? (Y/N, which legs)
Accommodation used?
Reviewer
Date
Concerns / mitigations
  • Does not define pay, working time, or contractual travel entitlements
  • Does not state that any specific door-to-door duration is prohibited or permitted
  • Does not reproduce Network Rail or other industry threshold matrices
  • Does not cover driver-hours, tachograph, or HGV/fleet compliance
  • Does not make a roster safe or prove compliance

Where fatigue models include commute or travel inputs, document how travel was estimated — see fatigue risk model inputs and outputs.